The Integral Medicine Wheel
In presenting various holistic ideas and models to students, I find that many particularly resonate with the Native American medicine wheel -- an ancient symbol that traces back 10,000 years in the Americas. Among the different tribes which have used it, the medicine wheel has served both as a map of the cosmos as well as a ceremonial and contemplative tool, a means of honoring and interacting with the world's elemental forces and intelligences. If you are not familiar with it, the following video presents a good introduction to this tool (from a modern Lakota perspective). I'm copying Part 1 below, but two other parts are available: Part 2, Part 3.
Recently, noting students' attraction to the medicine wheel, I have begun presenting the Integral map as a post-modern version of this ancient contemplative tool. Many students, when they first learn about AQAL and the Integral Map, find it to be flat, complicated, and "heady" -- they have a hard time connecting to it on a level that feels very meaningful for them, at least initially. So, to help bring it to life, I've been experimenting with this alternative approach. It is not something I would do with all students, or as a primary means of communicating Integral ideas; but I feel comfortable offering it as one way of conceptualizing (and embodying) the map. Tell me what you think!

The Quadrant Map as a Postmodern Medicine Wheel
The Integral map is obviously very similar, structurally, to the medicine wheel: a circle divided by a cross, and sometimes further divided into concentric rings. But beyond their physical similarities, they are complementary in other ways as well.
As I mentioned above, for many of the indigenous people of the Americas, the medicine wheel is not simply a representational map of the world; it is a tool of invocation, an evocative symbol system meant to call to mind, and connect the practitioner with, a vision of the many vital presences and forces of his or her world. It allows him to orient himself towards and actively participate in the sacred order of the cosmos. Because the wheel is often fashioned and used out of doors, frequently in the form of a ring of hand-gathered stones oriented toward the cardinal directions and the vibrant, storied landscape of indigenous consciousness, it is arguably -- and ironically -- experienced in a more "integral" or holistic way than the AQAL map, which often is presented simply as lines and labels on a piece of paper. The wheel, as an elemental symbol integrated with the landscape and allowing for embodied, ceremonial interaction, "speaks" on many levels at once; whereas the AQAL map is encountered most often as an abstract, purely analytical or "representative" artifact. And when it is presented or encountered in this way, I believe its potential power or impactfulness is often missed.
As I have come to relate to AQAL, I believe it is best seen as having similar evocative, invocational qualities as the medicine wheel or other mandalic forms -- a symbol system with the power to invoke a particular vision, a particular landscape of meaning. When we take the enactive paradigm seriously, we must recognize that, with something like AQAL, we are not merely charting out the world as it is. We are telling a story, engaging in a visionary exercise intended to orient and transform those who interact with it.
The AQAL map involves a subtler space than the physical space represented by the cardinal directions of the medicine wheel, but it aims similarly to point us in "elemental" directions -- towards our native perspectives (subjective, objective, intersubjective, interobjective) and the "worlds" that they enact. It invites us, in an elemental way, to orient ourselves, not to a particular landscape, but to the world as an experiential, multidimensional field in which we are active participants.

The hoop of the medicine wheel is often taken to represent, not only the wholeness and interrelationship of all of the elements of the cosmos, but the dynamic, cyclical patterns of its processes. The cardinal directions are associated with seasons, phases of life, even stages of action or decision-making, with each point being integrally related to the others. (Part 2 of Don Warne's series illustrates this well.)
There is a circularity, also, to the primordial perspectives of the AQAL map. As Wilber writes, describing how any individual holon arises in relation the entire AQAL wheel of perspective-dimensions, "[M]y supposedly ‘individual thought' actually has at least ... four facets, ... four aspects - intentional, behavioral, cultural, and social. And around the circle we go: the social system will have a strong influence on the cultural worldview, which will set limits to the individual thoughts that I can have, which will register in the brain physiology. And you can go around that circle in any direction you want. The quadrants are all interwoven. They are all mutually determining. They all cause, and are caused by, the other quadrants." But the AQAL map suggests not only cyclical relationships and horizontal dependent-arising; it points also to evolution, to the developmental unfolding of order and form in time. AQAL is a vision of nested orders, of wheels within wheels within wheels.
A number of other useful comparisons might be drawn also, but I will offer just one more. As you will note from the illustration of the medicine wheel above, various animal presences and intelligences, various forces and elements of the natural world, are associated with each of the cardinal directions in the medicine wheel. The wheel situates the human in relation to the greater-than-human world on which he depends, and with which he must live in sensitive, respectful relationship. In traditional Navajo custom, for instance, the medicine wheel inspires the individual to "walk in beauty" in the world (hozho), to acknowledge interdependence and natural reciprocity in his speech and behavior (k'e). The structure of the wheel communicates an ethical vision, in other words; a model for right action, not only right understanding.
The AQAL map also points to our integral relationship with all of creation. The center point of the quadrants represents, in some versions of the map, the Big Bang - the primordial seed event, the primal Flaring Forth, as Brian Swimme describes it, out of which the Kosmos was born. The diagonal lines radiating out from the center tell our modern creation story, a story of how particles and clouds of elements have gathered themselves over time into stars and living planets, coral and rubies, eukaryotes and troglodytes, leaping salmon and soaring eagles, women and men. And this story too bears its own ethical imperatives, its basic moral intuition: calling us to recognize in the unfolding of complexity and beauty, also the precious gathering of subjective depth; to stand and act in grateful acknowledgment of the entropic gifts of time, nested in circles within circles of teeming intelligences.
All our relations.

Help




Bruce, thank you very much for this. I cannot wait to watch those video's, but I have to go now. I will watch them as soon as I get back home.
Looks very interesting!
Hi, Annemieke, you're welcome. I hope you enjoy the videos! If you have any constructive feedback, positive or negative, I'd welcome it.
Best wishes,
Balder
i really like the comparison bruce and yes, this kind of perspective animates the aqal. i'll always remember my experience at the stein valley festival pow wow in '89, so i have a deep respect for indigenous intuition……..
um, the big bang eh? it sounds like a modern version of the flat earth theory to me. we walk to the edge of the universe and fall down? i doubt it, this goes on and on forever at the speed of life and light dude……it's probably multi-dimensional in ways that we can't even begin to fathom, too……..
Thanks, Andrew, I'm glad you like it.
About the Big Bang story, I'm not attached to it. But I think there is sound evidence that our universe is expanding, and the Big Bang theory is plausible in that context. But like you, I don't think “universe creation” is a one-time thing, lasting a few billion years and then expiring forever. I expect, if the Big Bang theory is true, there have been and/or will be other such events. No reason why not, as far as I can see.
Hi Bruce,
Thankyou for sharing this. I'm impressed with the way the explanation of the medicine circle is so simple, patient, and straightforward. I actually watched all three, which required a great deal of patience on my part as well. I think there's a great lesson in this, and your instinct to reach to the wheel and this illustration as a means of communicating integral concepts in a patient, simple way is spot on.
In one of the videos, I especially like the attention brought to the limits of the Platonoc 3 dimension system, neglecting the emotional aspect of the individual.
I'm drawn to the sacred aspect of the wheel metaphore, after all, the narrator reminds us that the wheel is a gift from the Great Spirit, and that the dimensions above and below the wheel contribute as well.
It seems to me that the wheel is the subjective center where individuals process and interact with outside influences. The influences may well come from the sacred heavens above and earth below, but the subjective processing and interaction occurs at ground zero. Its as if we are beings with a 2 dimensional perspective attempting to translate multidimensional experiences. Hence the value of the simple, patient 2 dimensional metaphore.
Hi, Dave, thanks for your comments. I also appreciate Warne's simple, straightforward approach. I think that the medicine wheel (and other mandalic devices) are appealing, in part, because they “concretize” abstract notions, embodying them in image, myth, story, etc – and this allows people to connect to the ideas on several levels at once. Energetically and phenomenologically, for instance, as well as conceptually.
Regarding your reading of the wheel metaphor, I think you are correct: the subject is situated at the zero-point, at the subjective center of a sacred, multidimensional field. In the Integral model, on the other hand, the center or zero-point is not exactly the subject; rather, subject and object dimensions both co-arise “out” of that zero-point, that non-abiding, creative openness.
In Warne's video, just out of curiosity, what did you think of his description of the process of decision making (the circle of values, decisions, actions, reactions), and the impact on the self-system (the integrity of the wheel) when connection to value (and Spirit) is lost? In some of his other teachings, he emphasizes he uses this simple model when working with individuals struggling with addiction, helping them when appropriate to acknowledge the debilitating impact of alienation from a deeper sense of spiritual wellness and connectedness…where feeling rushes straight into decisions, without first being processed through one's field of values…
Best wishes,
B.
Very interesting video's. I always like visual explanations, and I also like such elementary diagrams a lot.
What you noticed about decision making without the connection with value, I also found that very interesting and I had been thinking about that lately, especially conscerning the self and in what way the individual is or is not consciously involved. If the individual is capable of following his own values instead of those that are collectively important.
But I do not think that the model as was shown here is capable of mirroring Wilber's quadrants. I have been trying that too, but was never really satisfied with that. Lately I am trying to use the little more complex system of the zodiac, and I think it certainly has possibilities. But in a way that has much similarity with the medicine wheel of course.
I am always very happy to see others do this kind of things, especially if it is done so clear and abstract. But also in a very, as you could feel, compassioned way.
Annemieke
Hi Bruce,
To answer your question, I liked very much the way he overlayed different aspects of “being human” into the wheel metaphore, including decision making. I agree wholeheartedly that “lack of balance” causes dysfunctional behaviors and symptoms, including addiction. Its also my experience that awareness of and practice of Spirituality can help restore that balance and enable healing.
I myself have been describing similar processes in the classes I teach, but like Plato I've been using a 3 part model, motivations, thoughts, and actions. I'm going to start adding in the dimension of reactions from the emotional perspective as well, it rounds out the picture nicely.
I'm glad we're reminded to seperate emotion from Spirituality, since both dimensions are invisible they are easily confused, often to the neglect of one dimension or the other.
take care friend,
Dave
Hi, Annemieke,
You wrote: But I do not think that the model as was shown here is capable of mirroring Wilber's quadrants. I have been trying that too, but was never really satisfied with that. Lately I am trying to use the little more complex system of the zodiac, and I think it certainly has possibilities. But in a way that has much similarity with the medicine wheel of course.
I agree. In my comparison, I am looking more at the “spirit” of how the wheel is understood and used, rather than technical details. The medicine wheel does not encompass as much of the Kosmos as AQAL does; it is holistic and integrative, but not “Integral” from a modern perspective. But there is an active, embodied, evocative way the wheel is conceived and interacted with that I think is helpful for bringing AQAL off the page in a more lively way. Or that was my hope with this comparative exercise.
Best wishes,
B.
Bruce,
Thanks for this. I like the presentation and language. Maybe this time around the old horn, I will actually spend some time studying AQAL.
best,
Michael
Michael, thanks for stopping by. I look forward to crossing paths more and spending some time talking again on the forums and in the blogosphere.
All the best,
B.
Bruce….
I really enjoyed this! LOVE love the evocative embodied mandalic nature of it! I was/am definitely one who struggles with the “headyness” of AQAL, and am totally a visualizing, embodying, abstract practitioner… bringing it to life is KEY for me :))
Cheers,
Stacy
Thank you for your feedback, Stacy! I'm glad you liked it. I think a lot of people struggle with the headyness of AQAL, which is a shame – because I don't think it really IS “merely heady.” But that's the impression many people apparently have gotten.
Good afternoon Bruce!
Yes, my impression can certainly be updated! (I didn't make it to the conference so I'm sure I am out of the loop :) My curiosity is for the heady but then zeroes in on the “usability” factor, which for me means an embodiment, enhanced thru visualization (or even auditory like a mantra, key phrasing).
In the real world, when visiting a new city, I love looking at the map, and then driving freely, getting to know the terrain, getting lost, visualizing the map, or hearing the directions, and making my way through this new unknown! Then returning to the map to see what the heck I just did! (And typically I made it more difficult… that ol trickster in me ;)
Again, thanks for adding to my repertoire, my AQAL dashboard, dancing mandala :=))
~S
Hi Balder,
At the Intgral Pod, you say that integral is a metaconcept and not a form of spirituality. I would agree. However in some circles the concept seems to take on a kind of ambivalence. For example, the title of the book “Integral Spirituality” appears to imply that it will talk about a kind of spirituality. And indeed, Ken seems to suggest things like this in the book. For example, he describes various regimens, like we should all be doing wieght training as well as meditating, etc. In other words, he seems to be doing something prescriptive.
Of course, that old ambiguity concerning the roles of the pundit and guru is implied by all this.
Hi, Kela, I agree – and I think this ambiguity runs through Ken's work. It seems he is actually up to several things at once, and these things are not clearly differentiated in his work (it seems to me).