Explore
Gaia Soulmates
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?

Subject-Object Reversal (TSK Class 9)

Posted on Dec 2nd, 2008 by Balder : Kosmonaut Balder


Reversing Flows in the Field



In our final week of the first unit of the TSK course, we are working with an exercise called Subject-Object Reversal.  I haven't been able to keep up  with posting my practice notes for the past several weeks, which I regret, but in spite of the gap in continuity, I'd like to post a few notes from my  inquiries this week.  If you'd like to get a sense of what we've been working on since I posted last, check out Davidu's recent entries, which I've linked below.


In general, we've continued to explore "space" in relation to the sense of self, layers of mind, perspective-taking, and the construction or enactment of experience.  As you might expect, some of these inquiries overlap with the "knowledge" aspect of TSK, and this week's practice is no exception.   One of the important TSK ideas we've explored in relation to space, for instance, is the field communiqué.  This term refers to the ways in which our experience is communicated forward -- to the active enactment of a worldspace, with its given "order," its limitations and borders.  This worldspace includes the "self," rather than being a product of it:  self and world are a co-emerging communication, a communication which is understood here as a certain "field dynamic," an emergent patterning of meaningful (if  also often restrictive or frustrating) experience.


Many of the exercises and inquiries we've worked with consist of not-doing experiments, in a sense:  taking a conventional aspect of our experience and somehow reversing or violating or opening it.  Subject-Object Reversal also asks us to do this:  to first take note of normal subject-centered experience, exploring the sense of being located 'here,' observing objects 'there' (physically, but also in terms of thoughts, images, etc); and then to experiment with reversing this dynamic on several different (increasingly  subtle) levels.  On the first level, we 'allow' the objects in our environment (including even abstract, 'meta-level' features of our experience) to be the knower(s), and ourselves to be the known.  Then, after  practicing this for a time, we make several subtle shifts -- for instance, allowing thought or perception to 'do' us rather than us being the thinker  or perceiver, or allowing embodied experience to be 'experience knowing us.'   Later, we are asked to challenge even the sense of inhabiting or "being" a constant, abiding point of reference, releasing our hold on self-image.


The Seeing Tree

I have been working with this exercise throughout the past two days, doing it as I take my walks, but also as I'm sitting quietly, or as I'm doing other daily activities.  Each time I've worked with this exercise has been different (I've worked with it before this class as well), but this week I've noticed two different ways it has unfolded.  In one, where I concentrate primarily on moving the sense of being a positioned observer 'out' into the environment, I have a definite sense of being held intimately 'within' a sentient field -- like I'm re-entering an animistic worldspace, surrounded by many different intelligences or knowing presences.  I start with prominent objects like trees and plants and various inanimate objects, and then move on to more 'background' elements like the air or the ground, allowing the sense of 'knowing' to emerge from them towards me.  I feel immersed in a sensuous field of relationship, an object held by innumerable subjects.  Sometimes these "subjects" were prominent, and the "body" was an object under these teeming gazes; and sometimes there was more of a sense of I-and-Thou, where I was also a small but knowing presence in this field.  This is most certainly an imaginative exercise, but it is revealing -- because it highlights the conceptual or imaginal dimensions of the conventional order as well.  It reveals, by contrast, the psychological contours of particular communicated meaning spaces: whether I am 'suspended' as a 'receiver' and 'responder' in a living, knowing field (with the senses of intimacy and reciprocity that involves), or whether I am an active knower apprehending and relating to various distant objects (with the senses of power and alienation that entails).


Knowing Field Diatom Shell


On subtler levels, which did not involve imaginatively transforming the world into an ‘animistic' landscape of knowing subjects, I simply dropped the sense of being the "knower" and explored what it would mean for experience to be experience-knowing-me.  Here, my focus was not on objectified knowers ‘out' in the world, but on the unfolding of experience (as impinging knowing events).  It is hard to describe what this subtle shift was like, but in general terms, I felt it first (somewhat conceptually) as "being sounded" or "being plumbed" by the world.  It was like my body was a particular "space of potential," and experience was the knowing sounding of that potential: the moist, cool wind on skin, the play of light and color and shadow, the rich play of vibration and sound, were knowings of me (in the intimate Biblical sense) -- an intercourse, an intimate exploration of me (as a fecund space of possibility), a ravishing.  Emerging experience was the light arising of bliss.  At different points, I would find aspects of my experience which were unconscious and more solidified - anchors for the knower - and I would reverse them, too, so there was an ongoing, multi-dimensional sense of "being known," "being thought," "being felt." 



Flowing into Stillness

Even now, as I write this while listening to the music of Arvo Part, I find myself oscillating between normal modes of subject-object experience, and this "reversed" sense of experience-knowing-me, though at the time there is not a strong sense of "me."  Just this receiving of richly layered knowings, like liquids flowing and curling into stillness.



I plan to continue with this practice over the week, and may write more in the comments section below.  This is a powerful practice, in my experience, particularly as it aims so directly at the heart of our habitual modes of organization.  For instance, this afternoon, an unexpected but apparent outcome of the practice occurred as I was concluding my walk.  I had been exploring the "no distance" insight of another TSK practice (where subject is seen as the inseparable glow of objects), applying it to the Subject-Object Reversal practice as Rinpoche suggests, when suddenly I felt a rush of energy run up my spine and out the top of my head.  This blissful current flowed upwards a moment, and I paused just to allow it to flow, then resumed walking.  At that moment, I felt a strong pressure on the top of my head and I paused again, feeling a bit overwhelmed and dizzy.  I took a few slow breaths, allowing the experience to unfold and pass, and then returned to work.

~*~

Photomicrography from Nikon Smallworld Gallery.


Davidu

1.  Layers of Mind with TSK
2.  Exploring Layers of Mind with TSK
3.  Space of Memories of Layers and Contexts
4.  Expanding with TSK
5.  Expanding - Revealing the Field
6.  Condensing Experience with TSK
7.  Week 7, Generating Space
8.  Tracing the Tendency Toward Solidity

Balder

1.  Layers of Mind (TSK Practice Notes)
2.  Deepening Layers of Mind
3.  Week Three: Exploring Space and Form
4.  Week Four: Expanding Layers of Mind

Debyemm

1.  Layers of Mind (TSK Practice Notes)


Access_public Access: Public 11 Comments Print views (369)  
Davidu : Skysign
about 17 hours later
Davidu said

What a wonderful entry Bruce!  First, you've done some housekeeping by summarizing so succinctly where we are so far with the course, and the territory we've explored.  Then, I traveled with you on your imaginative forays into a magical dimension of living objects and the 'sensuous field of relationships', oscillating between passive receiver in meaning spaces, or active knower relating to meaning.  I've felt this 'alternating' that seems to appear always by surprise.


But I was particularly touched, and recognized in your description, my own experience of knowing space, of 'being sounded' or 'plumbed', of being rung like a bell, and lit like a bulb, by how full and massive a single moment can be energized…just how basic and awesome time and space can be.  It is amazing how playing with experience the way we have in the TSK vision has shown me how confined my normal way of living is.


Best wishes,
David

Balder : Kosmonaut
about 18 hours later
Balder said

Hi, David, thanks for your comments.  The first, “sensuous” type of animistic experience reminded me, concurrently, of David Abram's book, The Spell of the Sensuous, which is about animistic (pre-alphabetic) worldspaces, and of Merleau-Ponty's notion of flesh (world as a sort of living continuum of feeling/knowing)…  I don't think TSK is aiming, ultimately, at the same “space” Abram is describing, but a particular “phase” of my practice this week just seemed to echo it…

I like what you say about how these TSK exercises highlight the narrowness or “confined” quality of a lot of our habitual stances.  I've found the same thing.

This particular exercise is interesting to me, both because it can be so powerful, but also because I tend to have some resistance to it.  Several times when I've gone to practice it, like a few moments ago, there is an initial resistance to changing directions, to reversing this polarity.  Today, as at other times, eventually I've found that it sort of just kicks in by itself, after relaxing and letting go of my first attempt to make this shift in orientation.  But at the beginning, the brain says, “whoah!”  :-)

Best wishes,

B.

Balder : Kosmonaut
about 18 hours later
Balder said

If anyone is interested, here are Tarthang Tulku's actual instructions for this exercise, as well as his commentary (which also covers a couple exercises we're not working with right now):

 

Exercise 30 A Subject-Object Reversal


A. Consider all of your subject-object oriented experi­ence. Carefully observe the knowing subject and the dif­ference in quality that distinguishes it from the known object. Observe how the knowing is outward-directed and the objects are ‘away' from you.


After you have thoroughly studied the qualities of this familiar subject-object polarization, try to reverse it. Let the object pole ‘over there' be the knower, knowing you here as the thing known. Let all given aspects of the situation, however insignificant, abstract, or ‘metalevel' they might seem, be ‘knowing' in this way.


Try to incorporate the insight of ‘no intervening dis­tance' of the Object-Glow Exercise into this practice. Do this exercise for some time. You can practice it wherever you go, whatever is happening.


B. After sustained practice of Exercise 30A, do the same ‘reversal', but with your thoughts and your experience (rather than just with the contents or objects of experi­ence). Examine all your thinking, seeing, and knowing. Instead of you doing them, let them do you. On a more subtle level, take your ordinary experience, where you seem to be ‘doing' the thoughts, knowing, etc., and without changing that quality, let those very situations also be examples of ‘the experience knowing you'.


C. Finally, after working extensively with these rever­sals and subtle shifts in emphasis, notice that you have been preserving a constant identity of ‘me here' when indexing thoughts, and so on, back to the ‘self'. Let go of this self-image, of the assumption that it is the ‘you', the same position, in the course of the reversals.

Commentary 27-30


The preceding exercises help de-emphasize the notion of a knowing self. They also begin to show ‘knowing' as coming from a different level, which (unlike our ordinary model of ‘knowing') does not impose so many limits on what and how things can be known. Exercise 30 in particular is a very direct challenging of ordinary presuppositions about knowing, although it is still structured somewhat in terms of such presuppositions. It still makes a concession to our idea that knowing is a two-term relation, something done by something, to or regarding something else. It is a tentative, transition-level attempt to introduce ‘knowing'-in a different way than is usual-into the situation.


At first it will be just a foreground-background rever­sal. Later, the situation will change a bit, because the ordinary structuring of situations simply ignores the less prominent features (the ones not overtly engaged in the ‘knowing subject/known-object' pair). But in revers­ing the usual ‘knowing self' emphasis, we also overturn all the evaluations and priorities of the self. Everything, however subtle or secondary, must be allowed to know ‘us'. In general, Exercise 30 will be found very comple­mentary to all the exercises of Part Two on Time.  (Tarthang Tulku, Time, Space, and Knowledge.)

Balder : Kosmonaut
1 day later
Balder said

Here's an interesting example of subject-object reversal, which I found linked through Hokai's blog.

starlight : StarLight Dancing
10 days later
starlight said

WHOW…was you scared when you felt the pressure? i felt a little fear as i followed along with your experience…lol

great job bruce…just really awesome…joy…star…

i gotta play catch up and read davidus newest entries too…i have fallen behind following behind you guys…lol…

Balder : Kosmonaut
12 days later
Balder said

Hi, Star, yes, I was a little nervous when that feeling came, but mostly I just felt curious. I recognized the “pressure on top of the head” experience from contemplative literature, so I just relaxed and received it.

kelamuni : musician
12 days later
kelamuni said

The body swapping experiment appears to explain the illusory, constructed sensation some people report during so called OBE’s.

Davidu : Skysign
20 days later
Davidu said

Well, Ollie! Here’s another fine ‘book’ you’ve gotten me into! (Small shuffle, ruffle tie and squint, tip bowler). I’m really loving David Abram’s, ‘The Spell of the Sensuous’


You’re a good friend, Ollie. :-)



Merry Christmas,


D

Balder : Kosmonaut
21 days later
Balder said

LOL! Glad you like it. It’s a beautiful book… I use portions of it in one of my classes.

Your book pusher friend,

B.

starlight : StarLight Dancing
22 days later
starlight said

Bruce, i just read this again and i have to tell you how wonderfully articulate you are in your descriptions…and, it resonated at an even deeper level this time, im sure b/c i have read tsk…and have a better understanding or at least a little better understanding…lol

i tried this a little, but don’t have any notes…and i can see why you stated it was so powerful; when reversing, just the attempt seems to suck all the conditioning and tenseness out of the body…

i also can relate to the initial response of whoah…lol

i am really grateful for you and david sharing all of this…for me, just starting out, trying the exercises are like being a baby learning how to walk…lol…just reading them from the book i had no idea how to really go about attempting to actually do them…but after reading tsk, and the examples from the book and then coming back here and reading your actual experience…it almost is as easy as sliding right into it and having my own experience while reading yours…needless to say i will be reading all the entries over again and am certain i will be able to gain a deeper insight to the knowledge within them, which will in turn enable me to have a deeper experience of the exercise myself…

while i was reading your reversal of the object doing the knowing instead of you…i tried it with the computer…hehe…but the affect was so powerful it was a little scarry…like my experience of falling into dark deep space one time…lol…but i am going to work with this b/c i can already see that i am certain to have very positive results…

oh, and i tried the looking back/inward with my eyes…that was powerful too…

one thing i noticed today, and you mentioned in this post was that knowledge is not always pleasant when it is being revealed…in fact it can be quiet uncomfortable…even painful…lol

be well…joy*

Balder : Kosmonaut
24 days later
Balder said

Hi, Star, thank you for your comments. I’m really glad these notes are useful for you. I sometimes wondered about the value of posting this stuff, since so few people know about, much less practice, TSK!

The Subject-Object Reversal exercise is powerful, isn’t it? I don’t do it often, partly because it can be somewhat intense. But it is actually one of my favorites.

A milder one, which I do often, is Exercise 16 from the TSK book – just connecting to time, space, and knowledge in conventional experience. Similar to what you described as arising for you naturally when you met with friendsafter reading the TSK book.

If you do work with Subject-Object Reversal more, I’d love to hear about your experiences.

Best wishes,

Balder

You have to be a Gaia member to post comments.
Login or Join now!